Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
WILLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05760
Plaintiff:
LISA MECHELLE WILLEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Latasha Barron v. Mobile County Department of Human Resources, et al
as 21-14022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATASHA MECHELLE BARRON
Defendant / Appellee:
MOBILE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, MYESHA LEE, Case Worker, SHANTAE WEBB, Case Manager and others
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv60334
Plaintiff:
MECHELLE A WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37975
Plaintiff:
MECHELLE M SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barron v. Mobile County Department of Human Resources et al
as 1:2021cv00322
Plaintiff:
Latasha Mechelle Barron
Defendant:
Mobile County Department of Human Resources, Myesha Lee, Shantae Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00815
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Montgomery v. Nationstar
as 8:2020cv00077
Defendant:
Nationstar d/b/a Mr. Cooper and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Mechelle Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00344
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
