Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Collings et al v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Eujena R Collings and J Monroe Johnson
Defendant:
Marshall County, Alabama, Samuel Ebeyer, Phil Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthews v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Scott Matthews
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Collings v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00655
Defendant:
James Dee Walker, Timothy Allen Jolley, Mitchell Scott Floyd and others
Plaintiff:
Eujena Rogers Collings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chappell v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00696
Defendant:
Dekalb County, Alabama, Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy T Buckner and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Coit Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'DOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15494
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL SCOTT O'DOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEATHERLY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv01189
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL SCOTT WEATHERLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv24590
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Johnson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2013cv00396
Petitioner:
Mitchell Scott Johnson
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
