Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Casey v. Terry et al
as 3:2024cv01260
Defendant:
NAPH Care, David Terry, Thomas Freese and others
Plaintiff:
Quintus Bernard Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gant v. Naph Care et al
as 8:2024cv02115
Defendant:
Naph Care and Sarasota County Jail
Plaintiff:
Andre Patrick Gant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway v. Deputy Pritchett et al
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Arnderico Holloway
Defendant:
Deputy Pritchett, Deputy Will, Patrick Labot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. NAPH Care et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00724
Plaintiff:
Andrew Houston Watson
Defendant:
NAPH Care, Montgomery County Jail, Lamarquis Singer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Naph Care
as 1:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Preston Jerome Taylor
Defendant:
Naph Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colbert v. Naph Care Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01315
Plaintiff:
Seneca Colbert
Defendant:
Naph Care Inc. and Latoya Ajileye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Footman v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv01317
Plaintiff:
Justin Footman
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Chief Jailer, Sheriff Patrick Labat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyo v. Naph Care et al
as 8:2021cv02398
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Robert Arroyo
Defendant:
Naph Care, Rick Wells and Manatee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Browning, Jr. v. NAPH Care Medical, et al
as 21-13360
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH BROWNING, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
NAPH CARE MEDICAL, ESTLYN HARDING, LESTEENA STAINS and others
Jacobson v. NaphCare Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03632
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
Naph Care Inc., Medical Director at Fulton County Jail, John Does (I-III) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
