Cases 1 - 10 of 1,806
Lett v. Oliver
as 1:2025cv00013
Petitioner:
Lael Lett
Respondent:
Noah Price Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TICE v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2025cv00010
Defendant:
CENTURION MEDICAL COMPANY, TYRONE OLIVER and WARDEN JOE WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
CHEVY VANN TICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Flagler System, Inc. et al
as 9:2025cv80014
Defendant:
Corrie O'Dea, Flagler System, Inc., Arthur Birmelin and others
Plaintiff:
Oliver James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Muriithi v. Byte Federal, Inc.
as 8:2024cv03009
Plaintiff:
Olive Muriithi
Defendant:
Byte Federal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1711 Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
Hall v. NCL BAHAMAS, LTD.
as 1:2024cv24990
Plaintiff:
Olive Hall
Defendant:
NCL BAHAMAS, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
WILLIAMS v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
CARA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and WARDEN KAREN FLOWERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNN v. KEMP et al
as 5:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
JOHN OSCAR DUNN, II
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PROBATION, BRIAN KEMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00469
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER and WARDEN KAREN FLOWERS
Plaintiff:
CARA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNETT v. PHAM et al
as 5:2024cv00466
Defendant:
DENNIS C SANDERS
Respondent:
ANGELA PHAM and TYRONE OLIVER
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BURNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gosse v. Wellstar MCG Health et al
as 4:2024cv00278
Defendant:
Augusta University, Shiloh Moorehead, John/Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Gosse
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA of 1993)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
