Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Thomas v. Hesselbein Tire Co Inc et al
as 7:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
James Thomas
Defendant:
Hesselbein Tire Co Inc, Hesselbein Tire Southwest Inc and Robert A Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bramlett v. Hesselbein Tire Co Inc et al
as 7:2022cv01315
Plaintiff:
Richard Bramleett and Richard Bramlett
Defendant:
Hesselbein Tire Co Inc, Hesselbein Tire Southwest Inc and Robert A Daniels
Petitioner:
James Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DANIELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10825
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A DANIELS JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWDEN v. CENTRAL GEORGIA CREMATORY LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00042
Plaintiff:
MS stephanie bowden and STEPHANIE BOWDEN
Defendant:
CENTRAL GEORGIA CREMATORY LLC, MR ROBERT LEE DANIELS,JR. and ROBERT LEE DANIELS, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
BOWDEN v. CENTRAL GEORGIA CREMATORY, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00030
Defendant:
CENTRAL GEORGIA CREMATORY, LLC and ROBERT LEE DANIELS,JR.
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE BOWDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Robert Daniels
as 17-12997
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT NELL DANIELS, a.k.a. Ponda
In re: Robert Daniel
as 17-10475
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT NELL DANIELS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2017cv80094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
In re: Robert Nell Daniels
as 16-14464
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT NELL DANIELS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Daniels v. Alabama Department of Corrections, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Daniels
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kim Tobias Thomas, Louis Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
