Cases 1 - 10 of 215
Robert Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-14024
Petitioner:
ROBERT JAMES DAVIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Smith v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00440
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Robert James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
DAVIS v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
ROBERT JAMES DAVIS
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swint v. Zipply et al
as 8:2024cv01365
Defendant:
Alexa1, Hello Kitty, Zipply and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Crenshaw v. Staton Healthcare Service, et al
as 24-10859
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES CRENSHAW
Defendant:
STATON HEALTHCARE SERVICE and ELLIS
Robert Crenshaw v. Staton Healthcare Service, et al
as 24-10338
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES CRENSHAW
Defendant:
STATON HEALTHCARE SERVICE and ELLIS
Robert Crenshaw v. Staton Healthcare Service, et al
as 24-10250
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES CRENSHAW
Defendant:
STATON HEALTHCARE SERVICE and ELLIS
Lindberg v. CAP10 Partners, LLP et al
as 0:2024cv60102
Plaintiff:
Greg E. Lindberg and UKAT Parent, LLC
Defendant:
CAP10 PARTNERS, LLP, SULLIVAN STREET PARTNERS LIMITED, TENEO FINANCIAL ADVISORY LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Friona et al v. Issa et al
as 0:2023cv62163
Plaintiff:
Farrah Marie Friona, Robert James Reynolds and Kristina Occean
Defendant:
Moises Issa and Robert Issa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Richard Bard, et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-13540
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID KLINE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD W. BARD, RODERICK BATES, JR., ELENA BAZILIAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, APOTEX CORP., MICHAEL MCCANDLESS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
