Cases 1 - 10 of 156
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Seay v. Lineage Logistics Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Shawn H. Seay
Defendant:
Lineage Logistics Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Simpson v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01720
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Simpson, Tracy Alan Read, Lakeshia Reaggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Seay v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 8:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Ryan Seay
Defendant:
Portfolio Receovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Seay v. James et al
as 1:2023cv05232
Plaintiff:
Tamika Seay
Defendant:
Lisa James and Antresa Lumpkin-Knighten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SEAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13740
Plaintiff:
TRAVINSKY KENYUN SEAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Seay v. Stinson
as 1:2023cv02979
Plaintiff:
Tamika Seay
Defendant:
Ashley Stinson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Seay v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00058
Petitioner:
Jonathan Seay
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SEAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17382
Plaintiff:
DUANE SEAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
South v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 4:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Kayla South
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Kari Pearce, Christopher Pearce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
