Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Stephen McDaniel v. Warden
as 23-10148
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN MARK MCDANIEL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN
Davidson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Darrell Leon Davidson, David Michael Martin, Larry James Martin and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MCDANIEL v. TOBY
as 5:2022cv00198
Petitioner:
STEPHEN MARK MCDANIEL
Respondent:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marks v. Catalano
as 0:2022cv60659
Plaintiff:
Stephen Marks
Defendant:
Sargent Michael Catalano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hall v. Bulloch County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Hall
Defendant:
Bulloch County Jail, Sheriff Anderson, Officer Mike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Hall
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, J. Kevin Perry, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNOPP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv00585
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MARK KNOPP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marks v. Sargent Michael Catalano
as 0:2020cv62036
Defendant:
Sargent Michael Catalano
Plaintiff:
Stephen Marks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93307
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MARK FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marks v. Broward Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2019cv62177
Defendant:
Michael Catalano, Scott Israel, Broward Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Marks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
