Cases 1 - 10 of 10
KING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10813
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv01168
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv15394
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv12295
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv07883
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv08631
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv76747
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv63481
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Jacksonville State University et al
as 1:2016cv01047
Plaintiff:
Jalen Green
Defendant:
Jacksonville State University , Kenneth Bodiford , Timothy King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
King v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00568
Plaintiff:
Timothy King
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
