Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Peterson et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00683
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Peterson, Jr, Jack William Top, Thomas John Toratti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
In Re: Equifax, Inc., Customer Data Security
as 23-10912
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRIAN F. SPECTOR, JAMES MCGONNIGAL, RANDOLPH JEFFERSON CARY, III and others
Respondent:
SANFORD HEISLER SHARP, LLP
Davis v. Walker et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Aaron Christopher Davis
Defendant:
W Walker, Sewel and T. Bryars
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv48991
Plaintiff:
WINSEL W WALKER JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv44941
Plaintiff:
BRUCE W WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Helping Hands Capital, LLC v. Walker et al
as 2:2021cv00715
Defendant:
Barry W. Walker, Barry W. Walker, LLC and Barry W. Walker doing business as Walker Law, LLC
Plaintiff:
Helping Hands Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01045
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00985
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv17063
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRYON W WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
