Cases 1 - 10 of 4,660
Jackson v. Morris et al
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kennin Dwayne Jackson
Defendant:
Deputy, Mr. Morris, Deputy, Mr. A. Wood, Deputy, Mr. Stearns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02411
Petitioner:
Kaivon Mitchell
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLAYTON v. WARD
as 5:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, GEORGE IVEY, STG EDWARD FLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Adams v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Adams
Defendant:
Christine C. Hernandez, D. Scott Mitchell and Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mesen et al v. American Strategic Insurance Corp.
as 6:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Mesen and Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
American Strategic Insurance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Mitchell v. Ideal Concepts, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Adren Mitchell
Defendant:
Ideal Concepts, Inc. doing business as Insureme
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mitchell v. Diversitech Corporation
as 1:2024cv02214
Plaintiff:
Shantivia J. Mitchell
Defendant:
Diversitech Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
HOUSTON v. MITCHELL et al
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MANDELA HOUSTON
Defendant:
OFFICER MITCHELL and DEPUTY WARDEN LATORSHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
