Cases 1 - 10 of 2,921
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Capstone Building Corp v. Travis et al
as 2:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Capstone Building Corp
Defendant:
Christopher Travis, Michael Hendrickson, Zack Shewmaker and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Travis Smith
as 24-11460
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TRAVIS LAMONT SMITH, a.k.a. Hound
Sawyer v. KLF Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01718
Plaintiff:
Travis Sawyer
Defendant:
KLF Transport, Inc., Concert Specialty Insurance Company and FNU Parmindersingh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Christopher Mathews v. Gregory Ackerman, et al
as 24-11057
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAVAR MATHEWS
Defendant:
GREGORY ACKERMAN, TRAVIS PARRIGIN, MICHAEL CORDERO and others
Prichard v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv01421
Plaintiff:
Travis Prichard
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richmond v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Travis Shantez Richmond
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Cunningham v. Walgreen Co.
as 0:2024cv60389
Plaintiff:
Travis Cunningham
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Cunningham v. Volusia County Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Travis Scot Cunningham
Defendant:
Volusia County Corrections, Sergeant Salas, Sergeant Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
