Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Wingfield v. Phams
as 1:2024cv02221
Petitioner:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Respondent:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wingfield v. Clegg et al
as 1:2024cv02220
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Thomas Scott Clegg, Jeffrey Mann and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey et al v. City of Dothan, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Noble Halona Bey, Latonya Dorsey and Mama T's, LLC
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Alabama, Stephanie Wingfield, Allison Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wingfield v. Pham
as 1:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wingfield
Defendant:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingfield v. Celebrity Cruises Inc
as 1:2024cv20655
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Dorothea Wingfield and Dorothea Wingfield
Defendant:
Celebrity Cruises Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
RAINES v.WINGFIELD
as 5:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
VINCENT KEITH RAINES
Respondent:
COLETTE PETERS, KEVIN PISTRO, MS BOZEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PESQUIERA v. WINGFIELD
as 5:2023cv00312
Petitioner:
SERGIO PESQUIERA
Respondent:
MARRY WINGFIELD and BARRY WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SANTILLAN v. WINGFIELD
as 5:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
JOE RAMON SANTILLAN
Respondent:
BARRY WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Wingfield v. Warden, FCC Coleman-1
as 5:2023cv00562
Petitioner:
James H Wingfield and James H. Wingfield
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
