Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Martin et al v. Williamson et al
as 3:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
Thomas Martin, Sr, Jennifer Vandiver, K. M. and others
Defendant:
Frank Williamson, Bryce Graham, Jr, Angela Hulsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Z.M.L. et al v. D.R. Horton, Inc.
as 8:2020cv00672
Plaintiff:
Z M LHOTKA, JOSEPH D LHOTKA, DANIELLE R LHOTKA and others
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc.
Interested Party:
Southern-Owners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWELL v. TALTON
as 5:2019cv00361
Defendant:
SHERIFF CULLEN TALTON, JEANIE VAUGHN, CAPTAIN GARRICK and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BROOKS HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swift Bey v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv00906
Plaintiff:
Blaane Marco Swift Bey
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Christopher M. Carr, Richard T. Hamil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balkcom v. Williams et al
as 3:2016cv01299
Plaintiff:
Charles Balkcom
Defendant:
Mike Williams, John E. Goode Pretrial Detention Facility, David Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Anderson et al
as 3:2016cv00977
Plaintiff:
Walter Kato Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Z. M. Anderson, J. B. Bailey, M. Boree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Anderson et al
as 3:2016cv00950
Plaintiff:
Walter Kato Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Z. M. Anderson, J. B. Bailey, M. Boree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chanel, Inc. v. 2016 Charm Jewelry et al
as 0:2016cv61605
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
2016 Charm Jewelry, 2015 Fashion Electronic Shop, Aaron Shume Jewelry and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Hinson v. Bias et al
as 3:2014cv01217
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reid Hinson
Defendant:
R. A. Bias, B. K. Kremler, S. T. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv22724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
