Cases 211 - 220 of 662
SAUNDERS v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv02492
Plaintiff:
MARIA A. SAUNDERS
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
HARRIS v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv02451
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HOLLOWAY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2018cv02402
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HOLLOWAY and DERRICK O. HOLLOWAY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
COX v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv02389
Plaintiff:
ANGELA M. COX
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
DAVIS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2018cv02257
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. DAVIS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
AYALA v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2018cv02165
Plaintiff:
CLELIA AYALA
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
PINKNEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2018cv01980
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
CHAVON NICOLE PINKNEY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
IVEY v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv01963
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
STANLEY EUGENE IVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CAMERON v. BERRYHILL et al
as 1:2018cv01935
Defendant:
JESSIE K. LIU, JEFF SESSIONS and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CAMERON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 rsi
CARROLL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2018cv01907
Plaintiff:
TANYS E. CARROLL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
