Cases 11 - 20 of 79
FRANKLIN v. USA
as 1:2020cv01644
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JEFFREY C. FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
VIALVA v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv01693
Not Classified By Court:
WILLIAM P. BARR, WILLIAM E. WILSON, M.D., NICOLE C. ENGLISH and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ANDRE VIALVA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
NELSON V. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00557
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. BARR, JOHN DOES I-X, UTTAM DHILLON and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Nelson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
HOLDER v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv03520
Defendant:
UTTAM DHILLON, KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Norris G. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PURKEY v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv03214
Defendant:
JOHN DOES I-X, KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, T.J. WATSON and others
Plaintiff:
WESLEY IRA PURKEY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
LEE v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02559
Defendant:
JOHN DOES I-X, UTTAM DHILLON, KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Not Classified By Court:
DUSTIN LEE HONKEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
as 1:2019mc00145
Defendant:
CHADRICK EVAN FULKS, PAUL LAIRD, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
ALFRED BOURGEOIS, JULIUS ROBINSON, JAMES H. ROANE, JR., and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BRUCE WEBSTER, ANTHONY BATTLE and ORLANDO HALL
Intervenor Defendant:
RICHARD VEACH
Intervenor:
JEFFREY PAUL
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LEWIS v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02013
Defendant:
JEFFREY ROSEN, HUGH J. HURWITZ, WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WILLIAMSON v. USA
as 1:2019cv01751
Petitioner:
JEFFREY HENRY WILLIAMSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
COHEN v. ENTZEL et al
as 1:2018cv02760
Defendant:
ANGELA DUNBAR and FRED ENTZEL
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY B. COHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
