Cases 31 - 40 of 639
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
David Wattleton v. DOJ
as 22-5337
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Victor Clayton v. DOJ, et al
as 22-5250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Victor Clayton, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in his official capacity, United States Department of Justice, Christopher A. Wray, Director of FBI in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ELLIS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2022cv02836
Plaintiff:
PRISCILLA ELLIS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, EUEREH COLTRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2022cv02839
Petitioner:
TERRELL BROOKS
Respondent:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02467
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02466
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02451
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02468
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
