Cases 111 - 120 of 243
PERALES v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2019cv03315
Defendant:
DONALD ALWAY, JEREMY WILTZ, GREGORY D. COX and others
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03000
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02462
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
PLUMMER v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2019cv01825
Defendant:
Franklin Myers, Mark J Murphy, MARK MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Plummer and DEREK L. PLUMMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
GRIFFIN et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2019cv00762
Defendant:
JOHN KOSKINEN, K. COLT, JAMES P. CALIGURE and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL ADEYEMI OMOTOSHO, MICHAEL T. CHOCK, JULIO RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2019cv00884
Not Classified By Court:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN MURPHY
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION doing business as AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01151
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
MURPHY v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv01441
Defendant:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, BANK OF AMERICA, MERS and others
Plaintiff:
MARK H. MURPHY
BLUMENTHAL et al v. TRUMP
as 1:2017cv01154
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, BRIAN SCHATZ and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Amicus Curiae:
HAROLD H. BRUFF, PETER SMITH, BOB CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
