Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv02730
Plaintiff: KENNEDY L. DAVIS and NO PARTY
Defendant: ROBERT ANTHONY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02731
Plaintiff: KENNEDY L. DAVIS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
DAVIS v. U.S. GOVERNMENT
as 1:2023cv00087
Plaintiff: MICHAEL L. DABIS and MICHAEL L. DAVIS
Defendant: U.S. GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant: KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff: DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DAVIS et al v. MTN GROUP LIMITED et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff: GUY L DAVIS, TERESITA R DAVIS, AYLA M DAVIS and others
Defendant: MTN GROUP LIMITED, MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY, PHUTHUMA NHLEKO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
GRIFFIN et al v. UNITED STATES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00762
Defendant: JOHN KOSKINEN, K. COLT, JAMES P. CALIGURE and others
Plaintiff: JOEL ADEYEMI OMOTOSHO, MICHAEL T. CHOCK, JULIO RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. BRITTIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00092
Respondent: D.C. CITY COUNSEL and MICHAEL D. BRITTIN
Petitioner: ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01646
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?