Cases 1 - 10 of 830,478
Kansas, State of, ex rel. Department of Agriculture v. Unleashed Pet Rescue and Adoption, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02152
Plaintiff:
State of Kansas
Counter Claimant:
Unleashed Pet Rescue and Adoption, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Kansas Department of Agriculture, Division of Animal Health, Justin Smith and others
Counter Defendant:
Kansas, State of, ex rel. Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
E.H. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv02759
Plaintiff:
E.H.
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C.D. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv02761
Plaintiff:
C.D.
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHAHID v. VAZQUEZ et al
as 1:2024cv06997
Plaintiff:
GARY SHAHID and Stanley Gary Thompson
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL VAZQUEZ, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE FOR NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McGrath v. Edmonds et al
as 8:2024cv01448
Plaintiff:
John McGrath
Defendant:
Richard Edmonds and City of Clearwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
