Cases 61 - 70 of 462
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hawkins v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2022cv06228
Plaintiff:
Cicely Hawkins
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Christopher Secash, Matthew Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-887
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
106A Comstock Hill LLC v. Savvidis et al
as 3:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
106A Comstock Hill LLC doing business as Christ
Defendant:
Alexandros Savvidis and Maria Savvidis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Ann v. Wiviott
as 22-480
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vivian Hill Ann
Defendant / Appellee:
Susan Wiviott, Bridge Inc., The Bridge Inc. and Queens Kendra Sheriffs
Defendant:
NYC Mental Health and Hygiene
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Mongielo et al v. Hochul et al
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
David Mongielo, April Bueg, Fava Jessi and others
Petitioner:
Jessica Bogdanoff
Defendant:
Kathleen Hochul, Mary T Bassett, Betty A Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
