Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Wynn v. Warren
as 23-942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James I. Wynn, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Phillip Lytle, LLP, Esq. Richard Evans, Cheswold (TL) LLC and others
Defendant:
Judge Paul R. Warren, Judge Thomas E. Moran and Judge Sam L. Valleriani
Coste, Jr. v. Town Of Islip et al
as 2:2023cv01339
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand L. Coste, Jr. and Fred Coste
Defendant:
Town Of Islip, Angie Carpenter, Islip Town Board Members John C. Cochrane, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wynn v. Warren
as 23-48
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James I. Wynn, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Phillip Lytle, LLP, Esq. Richard Evans, Lorenzo Napolitano, Esq. Referee and others
Defendant:
Judge Paul R. Warren, Thomas E. Moran and Judge Sam L. Valleriani
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Ortiz v. Tinnerello et al
as 3:2022cv01318
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ortiz
Defendant:
Vincent Tinnerello, Brian Trentacosta, Kelly McVey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wynn v. Warren et al
as 6:2022cv06362
Plaintiff:
James I. Wynn, Sr.
Defendant:
Judge Paul R. Warren, Judge Thomas E. Moran, Judge Sam L. Valleriani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Flynn
as 22-1859
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lorenzo Walker
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Flynn, Owner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Walker v. Flynn
as 5:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Walker
Defendant:
Michael Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
