Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-872
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01528
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01153
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Greene v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv00873
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-5, City of New York and Emory McClaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. The County of Albany, et al
as 1:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Jennifer E. McManney, Detective Michael Greene, Lieutenant #1419 and others
Plaintiff:
Quason Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bah v. City of New York
as 18-1853
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Oumou Bah, as the administrator of the estate of Mohamed Bah
Defendant:
Police Officers John Does, 1-50 and John Does, 1-10, employees of the City of New York
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York, Police Officer Vincent Johnson, Individually and in his official capacity, Police Officer Brian Stanton, individually and in his official capacity and others
Pierre v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06428
Plaintiff:
Charles Pierre
Defendant:
City of Rochester , Rochester Police Department , Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierre v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06427
Plaintiff:
Charles Pierre
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Rochester Police Department, Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Waterbury et al
as 3:2015cv00944
Defendant:
City of Waterbury, Ryan Cubells and Martin Scanlon
Plaintiff:
Michael Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
