Cases 11 - 20 of 159
Santos et al v. Parmitel et al
as 9:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Francisco Santos, Windsor Coleman, Miguel Melendez and others
Defendant:
Cheryl Parmitel, Chaz Andrews, W. N. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tineo-Santos v. Dudelson
as 1:2022cv10170
Plaintiff:
Francisco Tineo-Santos
Defendant:
Alexander Martin Dudelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santo v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01484
Plaintiff:
Francis Santo
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jennifer Reis, Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Bishop et al
as 9:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Reginald Bishop, Hill, Vesenske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tineo-Santos v. Piccolo
as 22-2736
Petitioner / Appellant:
Francisco Tineo-Santos
Respondent / Appellee:
Paul Piccolo, Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility
Silva v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv01020
Plaintiff:
Santo Carrero Silva
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Lynn J. Lilley and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silva v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv07635
Plaintiff:
Santo Carrero Silva
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Lynn J. Lilley and MedicaL Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Jones et al
as 6:2022cv06338
Plaintiff:
Byron Santos
Defendant:
Officer Jones, Sergeant D. Filighera, Sergeant Hessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv06811
Plaintiff:
Hiram Noel Mendez
Defendant:
Reginald J. Johnson, Stephen A. Ronco, Spenser Guerrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lovett v. Bennett
as 1:2022cv05462
Plaintiff:
Steven J Lovett
Defendant:
Acting Supt. Susie Bennett, Shane Topel, Kevin Darling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
