Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Smolen v. Brown et al
as 7:2018cv07621
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Smolen
Defendant:
C.O. Lyle L. Carrington, I.G.R.C. Supv. Q. Quick, John Doe-Inmate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parkman v. O'Connor et al
as 3:2018cv01358
Defendant:
John Doe, William O'Connor and Justin Quick
Plaintiff:
Robert Parkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baez v. Malin et al
as 1:2018cv02850
Plaintiff:
Candido Baez
Defendant:
Lesley Malin, Michael Capra, Lamarr Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juste v. Johnson
as 18-467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andre Juste
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Loretta E. Lynch, Michael Phillips and others
Quick v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv00243
Plaintiff:
Markim Quick
Defendant:
Westchester County, Aramark Correctional Services, Donna Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smolen v. Nevins et al
as 1:2017cv07494
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Smolen, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew Nevins, Vincent Tyre, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quick v. Lawrence et al
as 9:2016cv01285
Plaintiff:
Desmond Quick
Defendant:
Andrew Lawrence, Jan Okusko, John Bankert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quick v. Graham
as 16-3353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Desmond Quick
Defendant - Appellee:
Harold Graham, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility
Defendant:
John Robinson, Deputy Superintendent Security, Auburn Correctional Facility, John Pelc, Correctional Officer, Auburn Correctional Facility, John Putnam, Correctional Officer, Auburn Correctional Facility and others
Quick v. Annucci et al
as 9:2016cv00958
Plaintiff:
Desmond Quick
Defendant:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quick v. Minale et al
as 9:2016cv00807
Plaintiff:
Desmond Quick
Defendant:
John Minale, Jane Maleski, John Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
