Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Warner v. Doyle
as 3:2016cv01427
Petitioner:
Blake Warner
Respondent:
Kevin Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Duke v. Hempstead Police Department Armory et al
as 2:2016cv04484
Defendant:
Det. Darrell P. Aiken, Det. Marlon Bottoms, Det. John Galowski and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Duke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Lamb et al
as 9:2016cv00402
Plaintiff:
Raheme Byrd
Defendant:
C.O. Warner and C.O. Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanding v. New York State Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2015cv00585
Plaintiff:
Johnny Blanding
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections, Medical Department, Bruce Yelich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrion v. The City Of New York City et al
as 9:2015cv00376
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Carrion
Defendant:
Ms. C. Gammowe, Eugene Raimo, Jr. , Richard Prevost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corley v. Vance et al
as 1:2015cv01800
Plaintiff:
Royce Corley
Defendant:
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., David Stuart, John Temples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corley v. Vance et al
as 1:2015cv00232
Defendant:
Backpage.com, LLC, Capital One, N.A., Giancarlo Cavallo and others
Plaintiff:
Royce Corley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Warner v. LaValley
as 9:2014cv00765
Petitioner:
Carl L. Warner
Respondent:
Thomas LaValley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Swack et al
as 1:2013cv00974
Plaintiff:
George Williams
Defendant:
Keith Swack , Sean Warner , Matthew Raddemacher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson v. Baker
as 13-2937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jackson Keyron
Defendant - Appellee:
James A. Baker, Sergeant, Clinton Correctional Facility, Jack T. Johnson, Correction Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility, Justin D. Delisle, Correction Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
