Cases 21 - 30 of 902
Jones v. McCormack
as 1:2023cv08296
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arden Jones
Defendant:
Ned McCormack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. The Warden of OBCC
as 1:2023cv08295
Petitioner:
Rafael Arden Jones
Respondent:
The Warden of OBCC and Ned McCormack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv08313
Petitioner:
Rafael Arden Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Coggins et al v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv01153
Plaintiff:
Davide G. Coggins, Nagmeldeen Azaz, Larry Powell and others
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Montegari, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera et al v. Keefe et al
as 6:2023cv06503
Plaintiff:
Jayquan Rivera, William Werner, Abe T. Smith and others
Defendant:
Keefe, John Garcia, Erie County Sheriff's Office Superintendent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Shahid et al
as 6:2023cv06457
Plaintiff:
Hannah Jones
Defendant:
Naveed Shahid and Dhany Vijay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruggiero v. Jones et al
as 7:2023cv07157
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Stefanie E. Jones, Kevin C. Eschmann, Paul E. Julien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Jones
as 9:2023cv00959
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Robinson
Respondent:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv06917
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner Anthony Annucci, Sergeant Joseph and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Baran et al
as 3:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Baran, Bryant and Cabellero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
