Cases 31 - 40 of 109
Rogers v. Hines
as 3:2016cv00457
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Gregory Hines, Carol Chapdelaine, Jesus Guadarrama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damu v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2016cv00445
Plaintiff:
Kingblood Mfalme Damu
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Scott Semple, Monica Rinaldi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Jackson et al
as 7:2015cv05359
Plaintiff:
Tiquan Davis
Defendant:
Angela Jackson, John Doe, Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hartford Police Dept. et al
as 3:2015cv00933
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Williams
Defendant:
Hartford Police Dept., Emery Hightower, Cheryl Gogins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Williams v. Power
as 9:2015cv00061
Petitioner:
Angela Williams
Respondent:
William Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arzuaga v. Martin et al
as 3:2014cv01882
Plaintiff:
Jose Arzuaga
Defendant:
Martin, Zegarzewski, Erfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Appiah v. Dean et al
as 1:2014cv09246
Plaintiff:
Douglas Jhonson Appiah
Defendant:
Robert S. Dean, Elaine E. Friedman, Lisa A. Packard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Griffin
as 14-1686
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Hill
Defendant:
Steven M. Cohen, Assistant United States Attorney, Jonathan D. Schwartz, Assistant United States Attorney, Debra A. Martin, Assistant Attorney General In Charge and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Patrick Griffin, Superintendent, William Hopkins, Deputy Superintendent of Administration, Angela Bartlett, Deputy Superintendent of Program and others
Platsky v. Lee
as 14-792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Henry Platsky
Defendant - Appellee:
Halle Lee and Dr. Angela Kedzior
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
