Cases 71 - 80 of 1,341
Engles v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Jessie Engles and Jesse Engles
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Brian Fisher, Diane Van Buren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bemiss v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv01249
Petitioner:
Daniel Bemiss
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webb v. Daugherty et al
as 3:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
Daniel Webb
Defendant:
Daniel Daugherty, Kristine Barone and Burnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lang v. S.C.I. Sing Sing Superintendent et al
as 1:2023cv08627
Plaintiff:
Jamel Lang
Defendant:
S.C.I. Sing Sing Superintendent and Commissioner Daniel F. Martuscello, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong v. Martuscello
as 9:2023cv01038
Petitioner:
Willie Strong
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lettieri v. Daniels et al
as 1:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Joel Daniels and Cheryl Meyers Buth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petteway et al v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Taveras, Christopher Q. Petteway, Christopher Deveau and others
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Craig Washington, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herman v. Dinello et al
as 9:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
Daniel Herman
Defendant:
David Dinello and Imtiaz Samad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Mandalaywala et al
as 9:2023cv00983
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniels
Defendant:
Priti Mandalaywala and Kimberly Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gagne et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Gerard G. Gagne, Daniel Yesu, Michelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
