Cases 81 - 90 of 902
McBride v. Jones et al
as 9:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Titus McBride
Defendant:
G. Jones, A. Fredericksen and D. Gleason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv03686
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
The City of New York, Bill DeBlasio, Eric Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. NYPD et al
as 1:2022cv04995
Plaintiff:
Tarnell Leon Jones, Lesane Parish Crooks and Tupac Amaru Shakur
Defendant:
NYPD, Government Cumandty, LAPD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. All States ATL Gorgo et al
as 1:2022cv03528
Plaintiff:
Tarnell Leon Jones
Defendant:
All States ATL Gorgo, Colorado, LA California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. NYC-STATE and DOC et al
as 1:2022cv04675
Plaintiff:
Tarvell Leon Jones, Tupac Amarn Shakour, Lesan Parish Crooks and others
Defendant:
NYC-STATE and DOC, LA-State and DOC, Colorado-State and DOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. McClendon et al
as 3:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Charles Young and Charles Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn McClendon and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Jones v. Caputo
as 22-1130
Petitioner / Appellant:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Joseph Caputo
Jones v. Pliler
as 1:2022cv03817
Petitioner:
Tarone M. Jones
Respondent:
Warden W.S. Pliler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harlow v. Jones
as 9:2022cv00477
Petitioner:
Darrell Harlow
Respondent:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horton v. Jones
as 9:2022cv00382
Petitioner:
Jeffrey L. Horton
Respondent:
G. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
