Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00232
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miller et al v. Annucci et al
as 9:2019cv00030
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Mark Kinderman, Naomi Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miller and Kristerfer Passino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lasher v. Buchwald
as 1:2018cv01829
Plaintiff:
Lena Lasher
Defendant:
Naomi R. Buchwald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Cuomo
as 17-3551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrew M. Cuomo, New York State Govenor, Sandy Hamlin, Adminstrative Assistant, Donna Hall, Acting Associate Commissioner, Office of Mental Health and others
Defendant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, New York State Attorney General, Multi-Disciplinary Staff, Office of Mental Health, Records Coordinator, Fishkill Correctional Facility, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and others
Jones v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2016cv00771
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Erie T. Schneiderman, Brian Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerena et al v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2015cv00489
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Gerena, Richard Pellegrino, Donald Brusso and others
Defendant:
Anne Marie T. Sullivan, Donna Hall, Naomi J. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldstein v. T.A.S.C. Bx County et al
as 1:2014cv02057
Plaintiff:
Frank Goldstein
Defendant:
T.A.S.C. Bx County, Yolanda Cardona and Naomi Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arcia et al v. Hartford Police Dept. et al
as 3:2013cv00986
Plaintiff:
Jose Arcia and Jonathan Ward
Defendant:
Hartford Police Dept., Sandra K. Borges, L. John Van Norden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clare v. Rikers Island (R.M.S.C.) et al
as 1:2007cv04580
Plaintiff:
Naomi Clare
Defendant:
Rikers Island (R.M.S.C.) and C. Beinart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
