Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Campbell v. Hanson et al
as 1:2017cv01024
Plaintiff:
Anthony Campbell
Defendant:
Hanson, Department of Correction of N.Y.C., New York City Health and Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Lynch
as 17-26
Petitioner:
Damion Anthony Campbell, AKA Damien A. Campbell, AKA Damon Cambell
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General
Campbell v. State of New York Board of Examiners of Sex offenders et al
as 1:2016cv09816
Plaintiff:
Anthony Campbell
Defendant:
State of New York Board of Examiners of Sex offenders, Sex Offender Registry Board and Sex Offender Registration Act
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyes v. The People of The State of New York et al
as 2:2016cv05485
Defendant:
1 Police Plaza, Attorney General, Anthony Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Keysean L Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv07493
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Campbell
Defendant:
Benjamin Cheung, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Campbell v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv05385
Plaintiff:
Anthony Campbell
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Campbell v. Dept. of Homeland Security
as 1:2012cv05989
Petitioner:
Anthony Campbell
Respondent:
Dept. of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campbell v. USA
as 3:2012cv01047
Petitioner:
Anthony Campbell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv04260
Plaintiff:
Edsel Blackwood, Anthony Campbell, Rennard Henry and others
Defendant:
City of New York, Detective Jarrett Lemieux Shield #6258, Detective Lorena Chavis Shield# 0424 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Holder
as 10-4211
Petitioner:
Ricardo Anthony Campbell, AKA Richard Silvera
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
