Cases 11 - 20 of 154
Scamp v. Higgins Family Trust
as 23-294
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Loretta Gay Scamp
Defendant / Appellee:
Higgins Family Trust, Antony Blinken, Jeri L. Williams and others
Scamp v. Higgins Family Trust et al
as 1:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Loretta Gay Scamp
Defendant:
Higgins Family Trust, Antony Blinken, Jeri L. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barcliff et al v. City of New York
as 1:2022cv09762
Plaintiff:
Jackie Barcliff, Isaiah Charles, Jonathan Contreras and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK and City Of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Wilson
as 22-3010
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kevin Crosby, Sealed Defendant 2, Yefrel Brito, Sealed Defendant 3 and Marquis Yohanis
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Wilson, Sealed Defendant 1
Gartner Inc v. G2.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01291
Plaintiff:
Gartner, Inc.
Defendant:
G2.com, Inc., Nicholas Domino, Richard Rolbiecki and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv04907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP
as 22-1392
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP
Johnson v. Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP
as 5:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP
as 2:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. Pfizer Inc.
as 1:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Tammy Smith, Andy Green Jr., Bakhtiar Golbenaz and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
