Cases 11 - 20 of 145
Wynn v. Larimer
as 22-3029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James I. Wynn, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge David G. Larimer, United States District Court and Judge Paul R. Warren, United States Bankrupcty Court et al
Baker v. Coates et al
as 1:2022cv07986
Plaintiff:
Ralph W. Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
BCP Literary, Inc., The Atlantic, Laurene Powell Jobs and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Wynn v. Larimer et al
as 6:2022cv06352
Defendant:
Mark Updegraff, Judge David G. Larimer, Judge Paul R. Warren and others
Plaintiff:
James I. Wynn, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wynn v. Larimer et al
as 6:2022cv06355
Plaintiff:
James I. Wynn, Sr.
Defendant:
Judge David G. Larimer and Judge Paul R. Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoffman v. Great Northern Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00895
Plaintiff:
David G. Hoffman
Defendant:
Great Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Harris v. American Accounting Associatio
as 22-811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Harris and David G. Harris
Defendant / Appellee:
American Accounting Association, Lisa De Simone, Mathew Ege and others
Defendant:
Jian Zhou
Store Master Funding V, LLC v. Hines Sudden Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
Store Master Funding V, LLC
Defendant:
Hines Sudden Service, Inc., D.E. Foods LLC and David G Hines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Liebenguth v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv00285
Petitioner:
David G. Liebenguth
Respondent:
Angel Quiros and Connecticut Office of Adult Probation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rittenhouse v. Lydall Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07064
Plaintiff:
Joe Rittenhouse
Defendant:
Lydall Inc., Marc T. Giles, Sara A. Greenstein and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
