Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Perez et al v. New York Hospital Cornell et al
as 1:2016cv05794
Defendant:
102.5 Tampa, 94.1 Tampa, 98.7 Tampa and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Andrew Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthews v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv02311
Plaintiff:
Dare Matthews
Defendant:
The City of New York , Carmen Martuccio, John Doe and others
Cross_claimant:
Manny Roe , Gus Balidemic , SL Green Realty Corp. and others
Cross_defendant:
Abigail Dahan , Calin David, Michael Discala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2011cv01804
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Bishop
Defendant:
Susan I. Hamilton, Dare Family Services, Inc., Twanda Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Hamilton et al
as 3:2011cv01804
Plaintiff:
Gwen Bishop
Defendant:
Susan I. Hamilton, Dare Family Services, Inc., Twanda Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv04818
Plaintiff:
Dare M. Morris
Defendant:
City of New York and Department Of Social Services Human Resources Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
O'Connor et al v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00506
Plaintiff:
Bonnie S. O'Connor and William W. O'Connor
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. , V.T.I., Inc. and Dare Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dare v. United States of America
as 10-2574
Petitioner - Appellant:
Aaron R. Dare
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Dare v. USA
as 1:2008cv01336
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Aaron R. Dare
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Mohammed v. MJS Management Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv07060
Plaintiff:
Nurudeen Z. Mohammed , Husain Jibril , Bashkim Leba and others
Defendant:
West End Towers Garage Corporation , Bamford Garage Corporation , Bridge Parking Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
