Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Dappollone v. Beneficial Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv09395
Defendant:
Beneficial Bancorp, Inc., Elizabeth H. Gemmlll, Edward G. Boehne and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Dappollone
McFadden v. Annucci
as 18-1807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reginald McFadden, AKA Reginald Ghaffar McFadden
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Jr. Acting Commissioner; DOCCS, Maureen Boll, Deputy Commissioner and Counsel; DOCCS, Jeff McKoy, Deputy Commissioner of Programs; DOCCS and others
McFadden v. Annucci et al
as 6:2016cv06105
Plaintiff:
Reginald McFadden
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Jr., Maureen Boll, Jeff McKoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cuomo et al
as 6:2016cv06081
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Smith
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Cesar A Perales, Anthony T. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cuomo et al
as 9:2016cv00122
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Smith
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Cesar A. Perales, Anthony T. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. Annucci et al
as 9:2015cv01354
Plaintiff:
Reginald McFadden
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Jr., Maureen Boll, Jeff McKoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guarneri v. Bradt et al
as 6:2012cv06316
Plaintiff:
Joseph Guarneri
Defendant:
M. Bradt, W. Hughes, S. Dolce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Murphy et al
as 3:2010cv01361
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Morgan, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian K. Murphy, Mark W. Strange, James E. Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donahue v. Seirmarco
as 7:2010cv02207
Plaintiff:
Alfred J Donahue
Defendant:
James Seirmarco
Counter_claimant:
James Seirmarco
Counter_defendant:
James Seirmarco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
