Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Foster v. Donahue et al
as 1:2013cv01177
Plaintiff:
Anthony Foster
Defendant:
Donahue, J. Murray, E. Thatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Pippins v. KPMG LLP
as 13-889
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rehm, Anna Huang, Brian J. Cogley and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward Lambert, Jamie Schindler, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Kyle Pippins, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
KPMG LLP
Amicus Curiae:
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Joe Hand Productions, Inc. v. Murray et al
as 1:2012cv03826
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Christopher J. Murray and S & M Cooper, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Murray v. United States of America et al
as 6:2012cv06272
Plaintiff:
Robin J. Murray
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Marshals Service and Shane K. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Leal v. Cox et al
as 6:2011cv06544
Plaintiff:
Miguel Leal
Defendant:
Carl C. Cox, Todd Piasecki, Jacob Miller, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Stamford et al
as 3:2011cv00885
Plaintiff:
Jose Mendez
Defendant:
City of Stamford , Robert J. Murray , Kevin Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00089
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Murray
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv02290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
