Cases 11 - 20 of 463
Newsome v. The New York City Family Court et al
as 1:2024cv05265
Defendant:
Officer Acevedo, Detective Kareem Anderson, Officer Ortega and others
Plaintiff:
Tyre Fred Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler v. Ortega-Williams et al
as 1:2024cv04606
Defendant:
Bianca Ortega-Williams and Beatriz Ortega-Williams
Plaintiff:
Robert Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ortega v. Department of Correction
as 3:2024cv01020
Defendant:
Department of Correction
Plaintiff:
Jose Ortega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortega v. The Pizzeria of Islip LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03392
Plaintiff:
Santos Ortega
Defendant:
The Pizzeria of Islip LLC, Paul Saccoccio, Clifford Weinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ortega v. Richard N. Ash Center, M.D., P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv03399
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Rodriguez Ortega
Defendant:
Richard N. Ash Center, M.D., P.C. and Juhi LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Haxhaj (Beltran)
as 24-1135
Defendant:
BORIS BELTRAN, SHPENDIM HAXHAJ, YELTSIN BELTRAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Portillo-Tellez v. Garland
as 24-967
Petitioner:
DAYSI YULESI PORTILLO-TELLEZ, OSMAN ANTONIO ORTEGA-PORTILLO and YORDANY RUBEN PORTILLO-TELLEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Quinteros-Ortega v. Garland
as 24-852
Petitioner:
JENNY FERNANDA QUINTEROS-ORTEGA and FREDDY EMILIANO GOMEZ-QUINTEROS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Malan-Pesantez v. Garland
as 24-772
Petitioner:
ANGEL RUBEN MALAN-PESANTEZ, ROSARIO ERNESTINA NAMINA-ORTEGA, KARINA ALEJANDRA MALAN-NAMINA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Haxhaj (Ortega)
as 24-731
Defendant:
FRANCISCO ORTEGA, SHPENDIM HAXHAJ, YELTSIN BELTRAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
