Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Dixon v. MacPacken et al
as 6:2016cv06143
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dixon
Defendant:
MacPacken, Adriance, . Taylor and others
Dixon v. MacPacken et al
as 1:2016cv01460
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dixon
Defendant:
MacPacken, Adriance, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daverne v. Daverne et al
as 1:2015cv06097
Plaintiff:
Ludovic Daverne, Jr.
Defendant:
Ludovic Daverne, Human Resources Adm. Local Offices 39 & 37, Dept. of Homeless Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowery v. Edwards et al
as 6:2015cv06098
Plaintiff:
Darius Lowery
Defendant:
Edwards, John Doe, Gleeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Rupport et al
as 1:2014cv00671
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez
Defendant:
Rupport, Osbourne and Testam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Rupport et al
as 9:2014cv01006
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez
Defendant:
Rupport, Osbourne and Testam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv06360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Osborne et al v. Westchester County Department of Social Services et al
as 7:2012cv09468
Plaintiff:
Shakima Osborne , Princess Brown , Elijah McKintosh and others
Defendant:
Westchester County Department of Social Services , Stafanie L. Marvin , Jasmine Melendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Osborne et al v. Westchester County Department of Social Services et al
as 1:2012cv09468
Plaintiff:
Shakima Osborne , Princess Brown , Elijah McKintosh and others
Defendant:
Westchester County Department of Social Services, Stafanie L. Marvin, Jasmine Melendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
