Cases 11 - 20 of 168
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pace v. The County of Cortland et al
as 5:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Anthony AA Pace
Defendant:
The County of Cortland, Cortland County Sheriffs Office, Mark Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pace v. Waterwipes (USA) Inc.
as 1:2022cv09816
Plaintiff:
Brittany Ann Pace
Defendant:
Waterwipes (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Pace v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2022cv06392
Plaintiff:
Rosetta N Pace
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Pace v. Miller
as 9:2022cv00742
Petitioner:
Willie Pace
Respondent:
Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: DEVA CONCEPTS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
as 22-1142
Plaintiff:
Ginger Dixon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Alana Hall, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cristina Napolotano, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Katherine Robaina
Defendant / Appellee:
Deva Concepts, LLC, DBA DevaCurl
Tapinekis v. Pace University
as 22-1058
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elizabeth Tapinekis, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Pace University
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pace v. Miller
as 1:2022cv02365
Petitioner:
Willie Pace
Respondent:
Superintendent Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
