Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Kotler v. Boley et al
as 1:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
Kerry Kotler
Defendant:
C. Boley, J. Carreras, K. Chauvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Cunningham et al
as 1:2016cv09861
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dixon
Defendant:
Robert Cunningham, Sally Reams, Urbanski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Cunningham et al
as 6:2016cv06732
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dixon
Defendant:
Robert Cunningham, Sally Reams, Urbanski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ream v. Hill, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv07462
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ream
Defendant:
Berry-Hill Galleries, Inc., James Berry Hill and David Berry Hill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Ramos v. Poore et al
as 3:2015cv00518
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramos
Defendant:
Corey Poore , James Curtis , H. Reams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Reams v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 7:2014cv04210
Plaintiff:
Estell Reams
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Toddella Brown et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 7:2013cv08525
Plaintiff:
Toddella Brown , Aisha Boykin , Amber Osborn and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ream-Schafft v. Flynn et al
as 2:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Zachary Ream-Schafft
Defendant:
Keith Flynn, Thomas Tremblay, Robert Hofmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Newman, et al v. The Warnaco Group, et al
as 1:2000cv06266
Plaintiff:
Anthony K. Newman , Steven Asher Asoulin , Michael Cesar and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
David Simms , Merrill Balaban , Michael Ceaser and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
