Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Marcus v. Archer
as 20-3243
Defendant / Appellee:
Laura F. Tarantino, Melynda Boothe, Johnny D. Lancaster and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clark Marcus
Marcus v. Archer et al
as 1:2019cv07099
Defendant:
Johnny D. Lancaster, James Madden, Johnny Patout and others
Plaintiff:
Clark Marcus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dr. Gerald R. Finkel, as Chairman of The Joint Industry Board of The Electrical Industry v. Potenza Electrical Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00486
Respondent:
Michael Tarantino and Potenza Electrical Corp.
Petitioner:
Dr. Gerald R. Finkel, as Chairman of The Joint Industry Board of The Electrical Industry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Agro et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12402
Plaintiff:
Adam Blacharski, Jeanette L. Barnard Langford, Mattie Strother and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Chiu et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11893
Plaintiff:
Sajid Wraich, Estate of Kum S. Lee, Craig Watkins and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Anderson et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11509
Plaintiff:
Norman Del Toro, James Baumert, James Meskill and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07359
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Tarantino v. USA
as 2:2016cv03770
Petitioner:
Christian Gerold Tarantino
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones et al v. Tarantino
as 2:2015cv05211
Plaintiff:
Cecilia A. Jones and Wilhelmina P. Jones
Defendant:
Andrew G. Tarantino, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
