Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Friedman v. Sargent et al
as 3:2021cv00556
Defendant:
Nick Visconti, Cascone, Tom Sargent and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Friedman
Ettiene-Modeste v. Hartford Police Dept., et al
as 3:2021cv00200
Defendant:
John Builous, II, Hartford Police Dept., Farmington Police Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter M. Ettiene-Modeste and Dexter Ettiene-Modeste, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Han v. New Hill Top Nails, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01322
Defendant:
Hyun Shul Chang, Tom, Myung Sook Chang and others
Plaintiff:
Shunji Han
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bonadies et al v. Morrison et al
as 3:2019cv01715
Defendant:
Anthony V. Esposito, Vera A. Morrison and Rose V. Mentone
Plaintiff:
Dino Digiorlamo, Marjorie Mettler Bonadies, Lynda Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
York Insurance Co. of Maine v. Donaco, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00013
Plaintiff:
York Insurance Co. of Maine
Defendant:
Donaco, Inc., Lisa Doggart, New England Homes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gillums v. Wolf et al
as 3:2018cv00949
Plaintiff:
Kirk Kapeace Gillums
Defendant:
Tom Wolf and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robles v. United States Attorney et al
as 3:2018cv00370
Plaintiff:
Rolando Robles
Defendant:
United States Attorney , Attorney General of the United States , Ndidi N. Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schipke v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2017cv02087
Plaintiff:
Mary Elizabeth Schipke
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City Of Meriden, Meriden Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
China Petrochemical Development Corporation v. Praxair, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02005
Plaintiff:
China Petrochemical Development Corporation
Defendant:
Praxair, Inc. , Anne Roby , John Panikar and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
