Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,079
Nathan v. ServiceSource International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05734
Plaintiff: Miriam Nathan
Defendant: ServiceSource International, Inc., Gary B. Moore, Richard Walker and others
Stein v. ServiceSource International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04717
Plaintiff: Shiva Stein
Defendant: ServiceSource International, Inc., Andrew M. Baker, Jane Okun Bomba and others
Bellore v. Kijakazi
as 22-1178
Plaintiff / Appellant: Christopher Bellore
Defendant / Appellee: Andrew M. Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Lieb v. Korangy Publishing, Inc.
as 22-1084
Plaintiff / Appellant: Andrew M. Lieb
Defendant / Appellee: Korangy Publishing, Inc., DBA The Real Deal
Gardner v. Hochul
as 22-986
Plaintiff / Appellant: Phillip Jerome Gardner
Defendant / Appellee: Kathy Hochul, Governor, The State of New York, Dr. Carl J. Koeigsman, Medical Chief Officer, Department of Corrections and others
Arbeeny v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2022cv02336
Plaintiff: Daniel N. Arbeeny
Defendant: Andrew M. Cuomo, The State of New York, Melissa DelRosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00527
Plaintiff: Judith T Turner
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Johnson v. New York State et al
as 3:2022cv00191
Plaintiff: Robert W. Johnson
Defendant: New York State and Andrew M. Cuomo
Newman v. GCP Applied Technologies Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00545
Plaintiff: Fred Newman
Defendant: GCP Applied Technologies Inc., Peter A. Feld, Simon Bates and others
Le v. GCP Applied Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00750
Plaintiff: Phuong Holly Le
Defendant: GCP Applied Technologies, Inc., Peter A. Feld, Simon Bates and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?