Cases 21 - 30 of 80
In Re: Peter McCluskey
as 20-3558
Petitioner:
Peter McCluskey
Respondent:
Ms. Lee, Hearing Officer, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, in her Individual Capacity, Frank Seminero, Supervising Hearing Officer, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, in his Individual Capacity, Richard Levchuck, Supervising Hearing Officer, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, in his Individual Capacity and others
Allen et al v. Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00230
Amicus Curiae:
Vermont Attorney General's Office, Mike Eby, Derek England and others
Defendant:
Dairy Marketing Services, LLC, HP Hood LLC, Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Reynard Hunt, Jonathan Haar, Alice H. Allen on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated doing business as Al-lens Farm and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Stephen H. Taylor and Darrel J. Aubertine
Not Classified By Court:
ENE Evaluator
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Billings v. State Of New York et al
as 7:2019cv11796
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, Diane Curra, Paul J. Artuz and others
Plaintiff:
Maureen M. Billings
Interested Party:
New York State Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kastner et al v. Tri State Eye et al
as 7:2019cv10668
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kastner and John and Jane Doe 1-20
Defendant:
CIGNA, The EEOC, Town of Middletown NY Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Fischer et al
as 1:2019cv09754
Defendant:
C.O. Howard Drollette, Richard Lombardo, Hon. Sherrie Seeley and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Fischer et al
as 1:2019cv01384
Defendant:
C.O. Howard Drollette, Bashaw, Hon. Sherrie Seeley and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Copeland v. US Bank Cust PC5 Sterling National et al
as 3:2019cv01156
Defendant:
Governor's Office, US Bank, NA, Surety Title Company and others
Plaintiff:
Marcia Copeland
Collier et al v. New York State Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2018cv07992
Plaintiff:
Joyce Collier, David Rosenbaum, Patricia J. Campolo and others
Defendant:
Kroll and Independent, Plumbers Local Union #1, Organized Crime Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
IN RE American International Group, Inc Securities Litigation
as 1:2004cv08141
Lead Plaintiff:
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico, State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Feder and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jerome Noll, Stephan Frank, Joseph Scuilla and others
Appellant:
Alan Rothstein, Marisa Rothstein, Mollye Rothstein and others
Petitioner:
THE STATE TREASURER OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, CUSTODIAN OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, MICHIGAN STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, AN, Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, The Reynolds Group and others
Defendant:
American International Group, Inc., Maurice Greenberg, Howard Smith and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
State of New York Attorney General Office and Marshall Orloff
Not Classified By Court:
Margaret B. Amidei, KAREN J MICHAELS, Lee Janovits and others
Interested Party:
Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System
Amicus Curiae:
North American Securties Administrators Association, Inc.
Intervenor:
Jacksonville Police & Fire Pension Fund and James Connolly
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Jamil v. Vermont Judicial Admin
as 17-3987
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Taifoor Jamil
Defendant - Appellee:
Vermont Attorney General's Office, Crittenden Unit for Special Investigations, South Burlington Police Department and others
Defendant:
State of Vermont, Judicial Administration, Chittenden Superior Court and Two Undisclosed Individual
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
