Cases 21 - 30 of 120
Burnham-LaFlam v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00146
Plaintiff:
Laura Burnham-LaFlam
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Long et al v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 5:2017cv00506
Plaintiff:
Susan B. Long and David Burnham
Defendant:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Garvin v. Burnham Securities, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00626
Petitioner:
Anthony F. Garvin
Respondent:
David S. Gilio and Burnham Securities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Spiewak et al v. A.O. Smith Water Products et al
as 1:2017cv00040
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Water Products, Avocet Enterprises, Inc., Bird Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Spiewak, Thomas Spiewak and Ellen Spiewak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Cantey v. County of Albany et al
as 1:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andre Cantey
Defendant:
County of Albany, City of Albany, Albany Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Forbes et al
as 3:2015cv00613
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Scarlett Forbes, Mark Frayne, Waldron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maguire et al v. A.O. Smith Water Products Co. et al
as 1:2014cv07578
Plaintiff:
Marie T. Maguire and A.C. and S., Inc.
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Water Products Co., A.P. Green Industries, Inc., Crane Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Breen et al v. A. L. Eastmond & Sons, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06261
Plaintiff:
John F. Breen and Milvi Breen
Defendant:
A. L. Eastmond & Sons, Inc. , A.O. Smith Corporation , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melendez v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv06024
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Melendez
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Department of Homeless Services, Judy Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
