Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 144
Nguyen v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06091
Plaintiff: Michael Nguyen
Defendant: Epizyme, Inc., Ken Bate, Roy A. Beveridge and others
Aziz v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv04113
Plaintiff: Muhammad A. Aziz
Defendant: The City of New York, Eugene (Gene) A. Roberts, William (Bill) Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene-Johnson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv04112
Plaintiff: Helen Greene Johnson and Thomas Johnson, Deceased
Defendant: The City of New York, Eugene (Gene) A. Roberts, William (Bill) Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calimer v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06027
Plaintiff: Charles Calimer
Defendant: Epizyme, Inc., Ken Bate, Roy A. Beveridge and others
Wang v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06031
Plaintiff: Elaine Wang
Defendant: Epizyme, Inc., Ken Bate, Roy A. Beveridge, M.D. and others
Stein v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05934
Plaintiff: Shiva Stein
Defendant: Epizyme, Inc., Ken Bate, Roy A. Beveridge, M.D. and others
Conroy v. Delshah Management LLC
as 1:2022cv04021
Plaintiff: Brian Conroy
Defendant: Delshah Management LLC
Not Classified By Court: Barry J Peek
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Conroy v. Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv00609
Plaintiff: Evan Conroy
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv07018
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Conroy et al v. Agilis Engineering, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01659
Plaintiff: Tom Conroy, Daniel Sartoris, Christopher Novoa and others
Defendant: Agilis Engineering, Inc., Belcan Engineering Group, LLC, Cyient, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?