Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Thomas v. Westchester County et al
as 7:2012cv06718
Plaintiff:
Shawn D. Thomas
Defendant:
Westchester County, Correct Care Solutions LLC, Val and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allinder et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03817
Plaintiff:
Juanita Allinder, Willie Banks, Anna Beaver and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Duffy et al v. Ruttura & Sons Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02918
Plaintiff:
Scott Adrian, Phillip Capobianco, John Duffy and others
Defendant:
D. Thomas Ruttura and Ruttura & Sons Construction Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Thomas v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv01625
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Thomas
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv06893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Abbott et al v. Tonawanda Coke Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Abbott , Anthony Adimey , Dana Allen and others
Defendant:
Tonawanda Coke Corporation , James Donald Crane and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kent v. Thoma
as 10-3688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith Kent
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard D. Thomas and Michael Notto
Global Gospel Music Group LLC et al v. Habukkuk Music, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01818
Plaintiff:
Global Gospel Music Group LLC and Isaiah D. Thomas
Defendant:
Habukkuk Music, Inc. and April Washington-Essex
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Kent v. Thomas et al
as 1:2008cv00571
Plaintiff:
Keith Kent
Defendant:
Richard D. Thomas and Michael Notto
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
