Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Gaddy v. Waterfront Commission et al
as 1:2013cv03322
Plaintiff:
Justin S. Gaddy
Defendant:
Waterfront Commission, Ray Gorsky, U.S. Health Works and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Cigarette Labeling & Advertising Act
Gaddy et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv00982
Plaintiff:
Sharia Gaddy , Jodeci Gaddy , Kadajah Stewart and others
Defendant:
The City of New York , Junio Acosta, Julian Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stroman et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv03776
Respondent:
Anthony Aviles, Police Officers John Does 1-5, Angelo Rubano and others
Petitioner:
Jacqueline Gaddy and Charles Stroman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaddis Partners, Ltd. et al v. T3 Media, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv03516
Plaintiff:
Gaddis Partners, Ltd.
Defendant:
T3 Media, LLC , Robert Sek and T3Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Stroman et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv03423
Plaintiff:
Charles Stroman and Jacqueline Gaddy
Defendant:
The City of New York , Angelo Rubano, Anthony Aviles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddy v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv01136
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and Omar Lewis
Plaintiff:
Venice Gaddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Tashiron v. Marticelo et al
as 9:2010cv00594
Plaintiff:
Gaddy Tashiron
Defendant:
Marticelo, Marticello, P. Trowbridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
