Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 214
Johnson v. Gibbs
as 22-1424
Petitioner: Robert W. Johnson
Respondent: Gibbs
Gibbs v. Bank of America Bank, N.A.
as 22-1344
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel., Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Investors, 100 Drug Raped Women and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Eugene M. Gibbs
Defendant / Appellee: Bank of America Bank, N.A., Nationstar, DBA Mr. Cooper, United States: Freddie Mac and others
Mayes et al v. Children and Family Services et al
as 3:2022cv00750
Plaintiff: Noelle Mayes and Tarray Gibbs
Defendant: Department of Children and Family Services, James Shea, Trisha Fallone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Eugene M. Gibbs
as 22-1032
Petitioner: Eugene M. Gibbs
Respondent: Bank of America Bank, N.A., Nationstar, DBA Mr. Cooper, Federal Housing Financial Agency, (FHFA) and others
Johnson v. Gibbs We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00455
Plaintiff: Robert W. Johnson
Defendant: Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Connell
as 22-566
Petitioner: Robert W. Johnson
Respondent: Stephanie A. Connell, C. Gibbs, Radar Model Stalker Dual and others
Vurgun v. Maimonides Medical Center et al
as 1:2022cv00995
Plaintiff: Serin Vurgun
Defendant: Maimonides Medical Center and Kenneth Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Vurgun v. Maimonides Medical Center et al
as 1:2022cv00991
Plaintiff: Serin Vurgun
Defendant: Maimonides Medical Center and Kenneth Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. Gibbs
as 2:2022cv00043
Plaintiff: Robert W. Johnson
Defendant: C. Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Connell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00207
Plaintiff: Robert W. Johnson
Defendant: Stephanie A. Connell, C. Gibbs, Radar Model Stalker Dual and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?